Comparative analysis of international standards for the regulation of explosive vibration and current standards of Ukraine
V. Sokolovskyi1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7828-7107
V. Boiko2, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3443-1688
A. Han2,3, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0832-1338
V. Tsyhoda1, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6997-6384
V. Korobiichuk1,2 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1576-4025
1Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine
2 Institute of Hydromechanics of NASU, Kyiv, Ukraine
3 National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», Kyiv, Ukraine
Coll.res.pap.nat.min.univ. 2026, 84:193–207
Full text (PDF)
https://doi.org/10.33271/crpnmu/84.193
АНОТАЦІЯ
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to substantiate and develop the conceptual foundations of a universal adaptive approach to the regulation and monitoring of blast-induced vibrations, integrating dynamic geological factors, blasting technological parameters, and quantitative assessment of the deformation state of structures.
The methods. The methodological basis consists of a comparative analysis of the regulation of seismic vibrations from industrial blasts: international standards (USBM RI 8507, BS 7385, DIN 4150-3, ÖNORM S 9020, SN 640 312) and Ukrainian norms (DSTU 4704:2008, DBN V.1.1-12:2014, NPAOP 0.00-1.66-13) in the context of soil–structure interaction under various mining and geological conditions. Logical, hypothetical, mathematical-statistical, and comparative analysis methods were applied.
Findings. The absence of a universal adaptive approach that accounts for dynamic geological, technological, and regulatory factors leads to excessive conservatism of empirical limits and inefficiency in international projects due to the lack of integration of site-specific properties. The transition from static peak particle velocity (PPV) control to comprehensive analysis with strain-based deformation criteria is substantiated.
The originality. For the first time, an adaptive approach to regulation and monitoring is proposed, integrated with automated FFT analysis (resolution ≤0,5 Hz), correction factors for geological amplification, and recommendations for harmonizing DSTU 4704:2008 with Eurocode 8 and EFEE guidelines. This approach has been further developed compared to empirical models, improving deformation assessment accuracy by 15–25% and eliminating key shortcomings of traditional PPV limits.
Practical implementation. The results can be applied to industrial blasting in mining, construction, and tunnelling in Ukraine, subject to mandatory site-specific monitoring, calibration of geophones on foundations, integration with AI for real-time analysis, and harmonization with Eurocode 8 and EFEE data.
Keywords: blast-induced vibrations, vibration regulation, seismic safety, international standards, FFT analysis, peak particle velocity, blasting operations, regulatory harmonisation.
References
1. Gjødvad, J., Aimone-Martin, C., Dowding, C., & Jern, M. (2025). Comparison of international vibration standards for quarry blasting close-in to a residential structure. OneMine, 1–10. https://onemine.org/documents/comparison-of-international-vibration-standards-for-quarry-blasting-close-in-to-a-residential-structure
2. Niu, L., Yin, Q., Zhu, W., Chen, Z., Wang, A., Jiang, Z., & Chen, T. (2026). Online monitoring and data correction methods of blast induced ground vibration based on WOA-BP. Measurement, 258, 119567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.119567
3. Schnell, D., Calnan, J., & Roghanchi, P. (2025). A review of current blast ground vibration velocity and amplitude impact models and methods. ARMA. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12345.67890
4. Boiko, V., Kravets, V., Han, O., Han, A., & Zakusylo, R. (2023). Efficiency of Using Explosive Foam Compositions for Compacting Structurally Unstable Soil. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials, 20(4), 442–454. https://doi.org/10.22211/cejem/176913
5. Huang, R., Li, W., Zheng, Y., & Li, Z. (2025). Study on Vibration Effects and Optimal Delay Time for Tunnel Cut-Blasting Beneath Existing Railways. Applied Sciences, 15(15), 8365. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158365
6. He, L., Lin, Y., & Zhong, D. (2024). Research review on blast vibration intensity, waveform and spectrum: Prediction and active control. Shock and Vibration, 31(3), 456–478. https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2024.03.023
7. Boiko, V. V., Voitenko, Yu. I., Han, A. L., Khlevniuk, T. V., Zahoruiko, Ye. A., & Han, O. V. (2024). Otsinka seismostiikosti ob’iektiv krytychnoi infrastruktury z urakhuvanniam yikh vlasnoi harmoniky u vybukhovomu spektri tsyvilnoho i voiennoho kharakteriv. Tekhnichna inzheneriia, 1(93), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.26642/ten-2024-1(93)-308-315
8. Carman, R. A., Buehler, D., Mikesell, S., Searls, C. L., Jue, D. A., Toncheva, A. S., Yarbrough, E., & Hsu, E. (2012). Current Practices to Address Construction Vibration and Potential Effects to Historic Buildings Adjacent to Transportation Projects. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP25-25(72)_FR.pdf
9. Jelušič, P., Ivanič, A., & Lubej, S. (2020). Prediction of Blast-Induced Ground Vibration Using an Adaptive Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System. Applied Sciences, 11(1), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010203
10. Sun, J., Jia, Y., Zhang, Z., & Yao, Y. (2023). Study on blast-induced ground vibration velocity limits for slope rock masses. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1098630
11. Sharma, A. (2017). Estimating the Effects of Blasting Vibrations on the High-Wall Stability. Master's thesis. Theses and Dissertations. Mining Engineering. 38. https://doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2017.467
12. Yang, J. H., Lu, W. B., Jiang, Q. H., Yao, C., & Zhou, C. B. (2016). Frequency comparison of blast-induced vibration per delay for the full-face millisecond delay blasting in underground opening excavation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 51, 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.036
date of first submission of the article to the publication – 01/14/2026
date of acceptance of the article for publication after review – 02/21/2026
date of publication – 03/30/2026