№59-13

Improving labour protection management system at forestry enterprises

S. Cheberyachko¹, О. Deryugin¹, V. Gilpert¹

¹Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine

Coll.res.pap.nat.min.univ. 2019, 59:144-155

https://doi.org/10.33271/crpnmu/59.144

Full text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the work is to develop a complex approach to improve labour protection and risk management system (LPRMS) basing upon the risk-oriented approach to the organization of continuous process of personnel training at forestry enterprises according to DSTU OHSAS 18001:2010.

Research methods are in the use of conceptual complementary general scientific and special pedagogical statements to develop the employees’ independence to form their risk-oriented thinking on the basis of cognitive theory statements. 

The results. Requirements of European legislation concerning basic principles of the organization of the industrial training for workers have been analyzed. Certain weaknesses of the current system of personnel training (i.e. the system periodicity, nonavailability of the required competences formation to make quick and efficient managerial decisions to provide safety in the industrial environment) have been identified. A system of personnel training on the basis of risk-oriented thinking formation has been improved making it possible to control industrial risks and make responsible decisions for the risks minimization or elimination in terms of developing different variants of the systems of complex personnel protection while performing their corporate functions. An algorithm has been proposed consisting of three theoretical and one practical modules which will favour better personnel concentration on detecting accident risks and their control. 

Scientific novelty is in the improvement of system to train personnel at forestry enterprises; that training will favour the formation of risk-oriented thinking during the process of labour safety learning owing to the development of motivation basis involving professionally oriented tasks which include scientifically substantiated individual and collective forms of activity.

The practical significance. The research results make it possible to develop efficient basic model of training process in terms of risk management system and formation of risk-oriented approach in the sphere of occupational safety and health at forestry enterprises in the immediate future.

Keywords: labour protection management system, risk-oriented approach, occupational risk, hazard

References:

1.  Okhorona pratsi na pidpryiemstvakh lisovoho kompleksu. Problemy ta shliakhy yikh vyrishennia (2009) Retrieved from https://www.derevo.info/content/detail/5252

2.  Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony. Zakon № 1678-VII vid 16.09.2014 (2015). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/984_011.

3.  Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony. Zakon № 1678-VII vid 16.09.2014» (2008) Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_b23.

4.  Shulha, Yu.I., Sukach, S.V., Kobylianskyi, M.A., Velychko, O.L., & Mozghovoi, O.V. (2012) Avtomatyzovanyi kontrol system bezpeky pratsi ta zhyttiezabezpechennia. Problemy okhorony pratsi v Ukrainy, 22, 16-26.

5.  Hohitashvili, H.H. (2002) Systemy upravlinnia okhoronoiu pratsi. Afisha.

6.  Lesenko, H.H. (2003) Rozrobka ta vprovadzhennia SUOP na pidpryiemstvi. Okhorona pratsi, 6, 36-38.

7.  Serhiienko, M.I., Bakhtina, Ye.A., & Serhiienko, M.I. (2012) Pidvyshchennia okhorony pratsi tkatskoho vyrobnytstva za rakhunok vprovadzhennia novykh system kondytsiiuvannia zi zvolozhenym povitriam. Problemy okhorony pratsi v Ukraini, 23, 109-115.

8.  Romanchuk, A.A. (2010) Sistemnyy menedzhment okhrany truda na predpriyatii. Modeli upravleniya. Informatsionnoe posobie.

9.  Bochkovs'kiy, A.P. (2014). Prіoritetnі napryamki udoskonalennya sistemi upravlіnnya okhoronoyu pratsі na pіdpriєmstvakh. Zernovі produkti і kombіkormi. 2(54), 11-16.
https://doi.org/10.15673/2313-478x.54/2014.36335

10.  Coombs, W.T., (2015) Public relations’ “Relationship Identity” in research: Enlightenment or Illusion, Public Relations Review. Global Journal of Research and Comment, 41(5), 689-695.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.12.008

11.  McDonald, N., Corrigan, S., Daly, C.,&Cromie, S. (2000) Safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organisations. Journal of occuppational Accident, 34(1-3), 1-258.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00011-4

12.  Robson, L.S., Clarke, J.A., Cullen, K., Bielecky, A., Severin, C., Bigelow, P.L., Irvin, E., Culyer, A.,&Mahood, Q. (2007) The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: a systematic review. Saf Sci., 45, 329-353.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.003

13.  The Occupational Health and Safety Advisory Services Project Group . Det Norske Veritas (DNV). (2007) Oslo (Norway), Occupational health and safety management systems-requirements, 03.100.01, 13,100, 22.

14.  Archie, B.C.,&Ann, K.B. (2014) Business and Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management 9th Edition. Cengage Learning, United State of America, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Revisions to the 2012 Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) counts, Retrieved from: http://stats.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfoi_revised12.pdf.

15.  Chan, M (2011) Fatigue: the most critical accident risk in oil and gas construction. Construction Management and Economics, 29, 341-353.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.545993

16.  Hilpert, V.V. (2019) Navchannia ryzyk-menedzhmentu yak instrument dlia vdoskonalennia SUOP. Okhorona pratsi, 8, 14-16.

17.  Dekker, S.Z.W. (2015) The psychology of accident investigation: epistemological, preventive, moral and existential meaning-making. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 16(3), 202-213.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2014.955554.

18.  Dembe, A.E., Erickson, J.B., Delbos, R.G.,&Banks, S.M. (2006) Nonstandard shift schedules and the risk of job-related injuries. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 32(3), 232-240.
https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1004.

19.  Dollard, M.F., Bakker, A.B. (2010). Psychosocial Safety Climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 579-599.
https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X470690.

20.  Hansen, O.N. (2006). Psychosocial factors and safety behaviour as predictors of accidental work injuries in farming. Work & Stress, 20(2), 173-189.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370600879724.