№84-9
Bibliometric mapping of research in the mining field andits relationship with the sustainable development goals
V. Lozynskyi1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9657-0635
P. Saik1, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7758-1083
M. Lozynska1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3131-1277
D. Klimov1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-9697
1Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine
Coll.res.pap.nat.min.univ. 2026, 84:118–133
Full text (PDF)
https://doi.org/10.33271/crpnmu/84.118
ABSTRACT
Purpose. To identify the conceptual structure of research in the mining field, determine its main thematic domains and subdomains, and establish their relationship with the Sustainable Development Goals on the basis of bibliometric analysis.
Methods. Bibliometric analysis was used to investigate the publication dynamics, subject structure, geographical distribution, and thematic organization of publications in the mining field. The information base was formed using Scopus data and the TITLE-ABS-KEY query for the period 2000–2025. To reveal the field's conceptual structure, index keyword co-occurrence analysis was applied in VOSviewer, with a minimum co-occurrence threshold of 10 documents. Semantically similar terms and keywords with different spelling variants were unified. The resulting network relationships were used to identify thematic clusters, generalize them into macrodomains and subdomains, and further compare them with the Sustainable Development Goals.
Findings. The keyword co-occurrence analysis showed that the studied scientific field has a clearly defined multicomponent, interdisciplinary structure. Within it, three macrodomains were identified: the engineering core of mining, energy and digital transformation, and mineral processing and sustainable development. Within these macrodomains, ten subdomains were distinguished. The obtained results demonstrated that contemporary research in the mining field extends beyond traditional engineering issues and forms a broader scientific space that integrates technological, energy-related, environmental, digital, and managerial directions. The strongest relationship was also established between the field under study and the Sustainable Development Goals.
The originality. An integrated approach to interpreting research in the mining field is proposed, combining analysis of publication dynamics, keyword co-occurrence mapping, structuring into macrodomains and subdomains, and interpreting the results through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Practical implementations. The results obtained can be used to define scientific priorities, plan interdisciplinary research, position mining science within the context of contemporary sustainable development challenges, and substantiate development strategies for research and educational institutions.
Keywords: mining field, bibliometric analysis, VOSviewer, Sustainable Development Goals, sustainable development, science mapping.
References
1. Carvalho, F.P. (2017). Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change. Food and Energy security, 6(2), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.109
2. Dychkovskyi, R., Saik, P., Sala, D., & Cabana, E. C. (2024). The current state of the non-ore mineral deposits mining in the concept of the Ukraine reconstruction in the post-war period. Mineral Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-024-00436-z
3. Alpysbay, M.A., Orynbassarova, E.O., Sydyk, N.K., Adebiyet, B., & Kamza А.T. (2024). Mining mapping and exploration using remote sensing data in Kazakhstan: a review. Engineering Journal of Satbayev University, 146(2), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.51301/ejsu.2024.i2.05
4. Snihur, V., Malashkevych, D., & Vvedenska, T. (2016). Tendencies of coal industry development in Ukraine. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 10(2), 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/mining10.02.001
5. Buchholz, P., & Brandenburg, T. (2018). Demand, supply, and price trends for mineral raw materials relevant to the renewable energy transition wind energy, solar photovoltaic energy, and energy storage. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 90(1–2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201700098
6. Carr-Wilson, S., Pattanayak, S.K., & Weinthal, E. (2024). Critical mineral mining in the energy transition: A systematic review of environmental, social, and governance risks and opportunities. Energy Research & Social Science, 116, 103672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103672
7. Zaman, Q.U., Zhao, Y., Zaman, S., Batool, K., & Nasir, R. (2024). Reviewing energy efficiency and environmental consciousness in the minerals industry Amidst digital transition: A comprehensive review. Resources Policy, 91, 104851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104851
8. Chatterjee, C., Sindhwani, R., Mangla, S.K., & Hasteer, N. (2025). Digitization of the mining industry: Pathways to sustainability through enabling technologies. Resources Policy, 100, 105450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105450
9. Kirin, R., Ratov, B., Khomenko, V., Pashchenko, O., Hryshchak, S., Sarbopeyeva, M., & Nurshakhanova, L. (2026). Artificial intelligence technologies in the mining industry: Economic and legal assessment. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 20(1), Article in press.
10. Choi, Y. (2023). Interdisciplinary studies for sustainable mining. Applied Sciences, 13(7), 4621. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074621
11. Agboola, O., Babatunde, D.E., Fayomi, O.S.I., Sadiku, E.R., Popoola, P., Moropeng, L., & Mamudu, O.A. (2020). A review on the impact of mining operation: Monitoring, assessment and management. Results in Engineering, 8, 100181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100181
12. Herrera, N., Sinche Gonzalez, M., Okkonen, J., & Mollehuara, R. (2023). Soft computing application in mining, mineral processing and metallurgy with an approach to using it in mineral waste disposal. Minerals, 13(11), 1450. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111450
13. Fragkos, P. (2022). Analysing the systemic implications of energy efficiency and circular economy strategies in the decarbonisation context. AIMS Energy, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2022011
14. Deberdt, R., Smith, N.M., Calderon, J. L., & McCall, S.K. (2025). Critical minerals lists for low-carbon transitions: Reviewing their structure, objectives, and limitations. Energy Research & Social Science, 127, 104252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104252
15. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
16. Klarin, A. (2024). How to conduct a bibliometric content analysis: Guidelines and contributions of content co‐occurrence or co‐word literature reviews. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2), e13031. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13031
17. Leydesdroff, L. (1989). Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Research policy, 18(4), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(89)90016-4
18. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
19. Xiao, Y., Deng, H., Wang, P., & Xu, J. (2025). Exploring green mining research trends through web of science: A bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Sustainable Environment, 11(1), 2505288.https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2025.2505288
20. Monteiro, N.B.R., da Silva, E.A., & Neto, J.M.M. (2019). Sustainable development goals in mining. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 509–520.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.332
21. Mvile, B.N., & Bishoge, O.K. (2024). Mining and sustainable development goals in Africa. Resources policy, 90, 104710.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104710
22. Salieiev, I. (2024). Organization of processes for complex mining and processing of mineral raw materials from coal mines in the context of the concept of sustainable development. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 18(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining18.01.054
23. Nurmakova, S.M., Sarsembin, U.K., Dalbanbay, A., Abilova, G.K., Tusupova, B.K., Kurbanova, L.S., Zharkimbaeva, G.B., & Shanbayev М. (2025). Innovative approaches to the processing of ash and slag materials from the fuel and energy sector in the context of sustainable development. Engineering Journal of Satbayev University, 147(3), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.51301/ejsu.2025.i3.05
24. Cole, M.J., & Broadhurst, J.L. (2021). Measuring the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in mining host communities: A South African case study. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(1), 233–243.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.11.012
25. Bondarenko, V., Salieiev, I., Kovalevska, I., Chervatiuk, V., Malashkevych, D., Shyshov, M., & Chernyak, V. (2023). A new concept for complex mining of mineral raw material resources from DTEK coal mines based on sustainable development and ESG strategy. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining17.01.001
26. Worlanyo, A.S., & Jiangfeng, L. (2021). Evaluating the environmental and economic impact of mining for post-mined land restoration and land-use: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 279, 111623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111623
27. Gorman, M.R., & Dzombak, D.A. (2018). A review of sustainable mining and resource management: Transitioning from the life cycle of the mine to the life cycle of the mineral. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 137, 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.06.001
28. Xiao, Y., Deng, H., Wang, P., & Xu, J. (2025). Exploring green mining research trends through web of science: A bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Sustainable Environment, 11(1), 2505288. https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2025.2505288
29. Tan, J., Guan, W., Cao, A., Wang, C., Zhang, Z., Duan, Y., & Chen, H. (2025). Global research status and intelligent technology development trend of open-pit mining blasting: visualization analysis based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 11(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-025-00953-3
30. Corrigan, C. C., & Ikonnikova, S. A. (2024). A review of the use of AI in the mining industry: Insights and ethical considerations for multi-objective optimization. The Extractive Industries and Society, 17, 101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2024.101440
31. Soto-Vázquez, R. (2025). Life-cycle assessment in mining and mineral processing: A bibliometric overview. Green and Smart Mining Engineering, 2(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsme.2025.02.001
32. Ghorbani, Y., Nwaila, G. T., Zhang, S.E., Bourdeau, J.E., Cánovas, M., Arzua, J., & Nikadat, N. (2023). Moving towards deep underground mineral resources: Drivers, challenges and potential solutions. Resources Policy, 80, 103222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103222
33. Petlovanyi, M.., & Sai, K. (2026). Numerical modelling of critical conditions for the onset of a limit state in the rock mass surrounding unfilled underground voids in iron ore deposits. Engineering Journal of Satbayev University, 148(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.51301/ejsu.2026.i1.05
34. Krawczyk, A. (2025). Geomatics Education in the Mining Industry: Assessing Competency Targets and Implementation Challenges. Geosciences, 15(10), 374.https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15100374
35. Lozynskyi, V., Sai, K., & Vvedenska, T. (2017). The first year of implementing a new concept of the Journal "Mining of mineral deposits" of the National Mining Universityt of the journal “Mining of Mineral Deposits” of the National Mining University. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15407/mining11.01.001
36. Korman, T., Malvić, T., Lozynskyi, V., Briševac, Z., Kovač, Z., Hrnčević, L., & Pavlić, K. (2024). Mining and Mineral Processing Journals in the WoS and Their Rankings When Merging SCIEx and ESCI Databases—Case Study Based on the JCR 2022 Data. Publications, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications12010003
37. Fergnani, A. (2019). Mapping futures studies scholarship from 1968 to present: A bibliometric review of thematic clusters, research trends, and research gaps. Futures, 105, 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.09.007
38. Burnham, J.F. (2006). Scopus database: a review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1
39. United Nations General Assembly. (2022). Aggression against Ukraine (A/RES/ES-11/1). United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3965290
40. United Nations General Assembly. (2022). Humanitarian consequences of the aggression against Ukraine (A/RES/ES-11/2). United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3966630
41. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
date of first submission of the article to the publication – 01/10/2026
date of acceptance of the article for publication after review – 02/20/2026
date of publication – 03/30/2026